Morningwood apartments office space

NYC Apartment Deals

2016.07.19 07:18 sokpuppet1 NYC Apartment Deals

The best value apartment listings for rent & sale in NYC. Manhattan, Brooklyn, The Bronx, Queens, Staten Island. This is NOT the subreddit for just any New York City real estate listings. These are steals and deals. Under market or up-and-coming areas. Real estate seekers, sightseers, shakers and sellers welcome. Best affordable apartments in safe neighborhoods with good transportation, private outdoor space, or maybe a home office. Where could you move in tomorrow?
[link]


2011.12.12 14:49 dcnurse DC Rentals

[link]


2014.08.12 22:42 wihz Boston Tenants

For discussions, news, and organizing on subjects related to Boston area tenant's rights, issues, and resources.
[link]


2023.04.01 05:43 Elick320 master cheif converted

Respect The Chief

You're home now. We could finally make an officer of you. You'd have Admiral without much of an argument from anyone.
No offense, sir, but "The Admiral" doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
Master Chief Petty Officer John-117 is the most important figure of the human race in the mid-26th century. Abducted at the age of six by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), he was conscripted into the SPARTAN-II program. The initiative was originally designed to crush human rebellion against the Unified Earth Government as the human Insurrection movement neared its tipping point. John endured harsh physical and mental training, survived the physical augmentations required by the program, and was later matched with state-of-the-art Mjolnir battle armor.
Throughout his training and early career, John emerged as a clear leader among the Spartans and was set to lead a successful UNSC campaign to stop a brewing human civil war. Though through circumstance, he became the sole savior of the human race several times over. First, in the face of an alien hegemony called the Covenant--an advanced alien empire bent on the complete destruction of humanity. Later, against an eldritch parasite known as the Flood which toppled both the Ancient Human and Forerunner empires of the past. Most recently, John defended humanity against the efforts of an ancient Forerunner general called the Didact, who returned to take his revenge against humanity for wars fought a hundred millennia in the past.
Notes
  • Feats are shown in chronological order in-universe
  • Feats showing relevant scaling or context will be indented
  • Hover over a feat to see the source.
Height: 6'10" // 7'2" (In armor)
Weight: 130 kg // 451.3 kg (In armor)

General Info (Augmentations / Mjolnir Armor)

Pre-Augmentation / Training
Spartans were heavily trained almost daily since they were kidnapped at the age of 6, leading them to become physically and mentally prime by the young age of 14 even before receiving their augmentations.
Dr. Halsey marveled at what a spectacular physical specimen he had grown into. Fourteen years old and he had the body of an eighteen-year-old Olympic athlete, and a mind the equal of any Naval Academy honors graduate.
Description of an unaugmented 14 year old John; The Fall of Reach Ch 6
Augmentations
Codenamed Project: ASTER, the Spartan candidates were augmented to drastically increase their physiology and physical capabilities. Their bones were laced with powerful material to make them 'virtually unbreakable', their muscle tissue density was increased and lactase recovery time was decreased, they were given hormones to boost skeletal and muscle growth, increased eyesight, and had their nerves altered to drastically increase reaction time.

MJOLNIR Armor / Stat boosts

The feats in this RT will sorted by which armor John is wearing, as each iteration of Mjolnir armor increases his abilities further.
Unarmored - These feats occur after John receives his augmentation, but without any Mjolnir armor. They also all happen to occur when he is 14 years old and still recovering from his augmentations.
MJOLNIR Mark IV - The Mk IV was the first iteration of armor given to John and the rest of Spartan II's at the age of 15.
Neural interface / Onboard Computer
Mjolnir armor is linked to Spartans with a neural interface, which means they simply have to think and the armor would perform an action. Combined with the onboard computer, it allows Spartans to do things such as place Waypoint markers, or targets on their HUDs with a thought.
MJOLNIR Mark V - Deployed almost two and a half decades after the previous iteration of MJOLNIR, the Mk V now possessed recharging energy shields but retained the same double strength multiplier as the Mk IV.
Cortana - Cortana is the AI that was paired with Master Chief for Operation: REDFLAG, she is present for the feats that occur while John is wearing MJOLNIR Mk V and most while wearing Mk VI.
Hacking
MJOLNIR Mark VI - Due to the UNSCs rapid advances in technology, the Mk VI was deployed less than two months after the Mk V rendering it obsolete, containing major improvements in both shielding and stat multipliers.
MJOLNIR GEN 2 - The second generation of MJOLNIR armor developed after the Human-Covenant war ended. Every aspect of the armor has been improved upon and thrusters are now built into each set of armor, drastically increasing maneuverability.

Skill

Unarmored
Mk IV
Mk V
Mk VI
GEN 2

Strength

Unarmored
Mk IV
Mk V
Mk VI
GEN 2

Durability

Mk IV
Mk V
Mk VI
GEN 2

Speed

Unarmored
Mk IV
Mk V
Mk VI
GEN 2

Marksmanship

Mobility

Endurance

Other Spartan Feats / Additional Scaling

Weapons / Equipment

Enemies / Additional Scaling

The four Spartans that composed Blue Team covered his back, standing absolutely silent and immobile in their MJOLNIR combat armor. Someone had once commented that they looked like Greek war gods in the armor … but his Spartans were far more effective and ruthless than Homer’s gods had ever been.
submitted by Elick320 to Elick320 [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:37 silver_chief2 Why there are not more whistleblowers.

In some other sub topic I said that some ex CIA said that the CIA used to be siloed by a firewall between ops and analysts up to pretty high. Not now where ops runs the whole show and analysts deliver what ops want. Not my original words. There was push pack on that, as it was only a couple of people. I did expect that in a Chomsky sub. So I made some more empirical post as to why this might be the case. I expect most here already know this stuff. The push back was a reasonable response.
US whistle blowers retaliations
William Binney. NSA analyst developed earlier cheap system to predict terror attacks and congress learned of it. That was embarrassing and threatened the NSA grift. They raided his house. He says he is only a free main because he knows where the NSA bodies are buried. The doc A Good American is worth the fee. The character played by Nicholas Cage in the Oliver Stone movie Snowden is based on Binney.
Diane Roark, long time congressional aide, was in the shower when the feds raided her house. She was likely protected by Binney. She later speeches.
https://youtu.be/XZxsmxHEBK0
https://youtu.be/RhfqOo1LGvo
https://youtu.be/AMIrmt9sZyY
https://youtu.be/r9-3K3rkPRE

Ray McGovern is an outspoken CIA vet and whistleblower. Frequent guest on alt media.
https://youtu.be/upOsDrs2E7A
Scott Ritter said he would quit his UN(?) weapons inspection job noisily. He either would not spy for US or would not lie about WMDs. I cannot remember. The day he quit some friendly fed told him if he quit the feds would come after him. He quit, the next day he saw his face on TV, under indictment for espionage for Israelis. Feds win 99% of cases. They lost this one but the process is the punishment.
Later, Ritter apparently had some kinky internet habit. Maybe chat and/or web cam. Think it’s not a crime? Some how, a LOCAL detective learned of it, pretended to be underage, and Ritter did something over the internet. Convicted locally. Does not sound legal to me. No local meetup I know of. What crime? More important, how would a local cop learn about this? IMO illegal fed surveillance + “parallel construction.” Look it up or watch The Good Wife episode of the name. Funny.
https://youtu.be/peo5b63jjtM
Recently Matt Taibbi testified in front of congress about his analysis of the twitter files. The same day some IRS agents visited his home. That sends a message doesn’t it?

John Kiriakou: The ex-CIA officer turned whistle-blower. After he blew the whistle on US torture, Obama admin filed charges, convicted on lesser charges, sentence to 30 years served two. He said the IRS audited him 10/10 years.

Assange. This non US citizen was accused of breaking US law while not in the US, then essentially grabbed in another country and faces extradition to the US.

Now, how many here want to be a fed whistleblower? How many in CIA.

Here are some video links.

For years, the three whistle-blowers had told anyone who would listen that the NSA collects huge swaths of communications data from U.S. citizens. They had spent decades in the top ranks of the agency, designing and managing the very data-collection systems they say have been turned against Americans. When they became convinced that fundamental constitutional rights were being violated, they complained first to their superiors, then to federal investigators, congressional oversight committees and, finally, to the news media.
To the intelligence community, the trio are villains who compromised what the government classifies as some of its most secret, crucial and successful initiatives. They have been investigated as criminals and forced to give up careers, reputations and friendships built over a lifetime.
William Binney, Diane Roark & Ray McGovern Set for Talkback After A GOOD AMERICAN Screening at Symphony Space
submitted by silver_chief2 to chomsky [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:34 RealCape48 Advices needed please

I’m mostly a lurker but I’m going to get really personal for a minute. Together for almost 6 years.
BP wife (30) was diagnosed late October of 22. So, in May of ‘22, wife met a friend at work (we worked together) she became attached to this 23 year old female. Was always texting, snap chatting, hanging out at work in the breakroom, etc. I told her I was uncomfortable, she blew it off and told me I was jealous. Wife starts drinking heavily, and cheats on me with said girl and her fiancée in July, I caught them in the act. After I called her out, she threatened suicide. Never really apologized to me just chalked it up to being a shitty person and hating her life. I asked her to drop these said friends, she said no. I filed for divorce and moved out in August. Remember, we all work together and people are coming up and telling me that my wife is always in this girls office. Embarrassing. Somewhere in this time frame, wife starts seeing a therapist. We are now in Nov 22’ & 3 days away from divorce court and she wants to call it off. She and the friends are no longer friends. I agree, she lets me know of her diagnosis, the meds that she is now taking and how she will be in therapy once a week for the foreseeable future. She told me that if she was honest with her therapist from the beginning we wouldnt be 3 days away from getting divorced. (She basically told me she lied to her therapist).
Fast fwd, I left the company, so did the other girl. Wife meets new friend at work (24m) Dec 22’ she is still on meds and going to therapy. Everything is going well. January rolls around, wife is off her meds or takes one pill, or doubles the doses. Stops going to therapy and she becomes obsessed with this new friend. He literally does everything with us. We got back together in Nov of 22’ and we split again March 4, 2023. We have done 3 things as a couple, anything else, ole buddy is with us along with and future plans we made originally without him. She changed the locks on our apartment and deactivated my gate card, I didn’t even have all my shit out yet. I filed for divorce again. Ole buddy is shacked up with her I’m sure. My wife’s mom called me at 3am one morning telling me that she got an alert from my wife’s insulin pump that she was low and needed ole dude number because she wasn’t picking up.
Questions: what the fuck do I do? Should I call her therapist and Psychiatrist? Let them know she’s lying? I still don’t have all my shit, I don’t want to talk to her, her family is blocked. I’m seriously done this time but I’m also questioning if she has BPD instead.She is definitely manic or was when I left. She last told me she was on her meds and stable. Wild ride forsure.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
submitted by RealCape48 to BipolarSOs [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:23 throwawayairbnbbitch Fraud Air BnB listing causing eviction

Hello! My friend doesn’t use Reddit but:
Glendale, Arizona
Two days ago she received a notarized letter from a law firm stating that her apartment was found listed on AirBnB in early February and an inspection via the complex needed to take place within two days to verify residency and that she will be taken to court. She complied today and the people she let in just took some photos and left. A few hours later her mom (co-signer on the lease but not living there/not supporting financially) received a phone call saying that the listing was proven to be the residence and that they can either ‘see the complex in court or vacate the apartment before the court date to avoid a formal eviction.’
After the call she went to the leasing office in person, the only proof she was provided was a printed out screen-grab of the listing which is no long available online - our thought is it has been taken down since it was clearly fraudulent. The photos had to have been taken around the time she moved in but the culprit is a mystery (obviously she has theories but not relevant).
So the question is, is it even worth fighting this in court. She does not have the income for this and has looked at low cost legal advice/aid (the eviction/court conversation with the complex in perosn occurred this Friday afternoon so no actual contact) but how likely would this end successfully for her and what steps should she take going forward? She wants to call Airbnb tomorrow but would that be the lawyers call on how/when to contact them?
We found all types of examples of people being the victims of fraud listings but has anyone seen a case of the landlord evicting a tenant over a fraud listing?
Any advice/recommendations on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated!
submitted by throwawayairbnbbitch to legaladvice [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:22 srvcaptdelhi Service apartments Delhi offering cozy Comfort at affordability

Are you looking for a luxurious and comfortable stay while on the go? Look no further than service apartments! Service apartments offer the perfect blend of luxury living and cozy comfort, making them the perfect choice for travelers. In this blog post, we explore why service apartments are better than hotels, the facilities and amenities they offer, and why they are worth considering for all travelers. Let’s dive in!
Service apartments better than hotel
Service apartments offer a unique and luxurious living experience that is unmatched by any hotel. With their cozy environment and spacious accommodations, service apartments are becoming increasingly popular among travelers looking for a more comfortable, luxurious stay. Compared to hotels, Service Apartments Delhi provides more space, privacy, and convenience for extended stays all at an affordable price.
Unlike traditional hotels, service apartments come with fully self-contained kitchenettes that allow guests to prepare meals themselves. This saves both time and money as there is no need to eat out every night or buy expensive takeaways. Additionally, many service apartments also include high-speed internet access and other amenities such as in-room laundry services and even gyms – perfect for those who want to keep up with their exercise routine while travelling.📷
Service apartments Accommodation
Service apartments offer luxurious living without compromising on comfort. With amenities such as state-of-the-art kitchens, spacious bedrooms, and relaxing outdoor spaces, they provide a home away from home experience that is ideal for both short and long term stays.
The facilities and amenities in Service Apartments in South Delhi vary depending on the location and size of the property. Generally speaking, they will include all the basic comforts you would expect from a luxury apartment, such as high quality furniture, appliances, modern fixtures and fittings. In addition to this many service apartments also offer extra features like gyms and swimming pools to further enhance your stay.
The kitchens in these properties are typically well equipped with all the utensils you need to cook up a delicious meal or prepare breakfast before work each day. They also come with luxury features such as granite countertops or stainless steel appliances for those who want an extra touch of elegance in their kitchen.
When it comes to bedrooms, service apartments generally feature large beds with plush linens for a comfortable night’s sleep. They may even come with en-suite bathrooms filled with modern fixtures and designer tiles for added luxury during your stay.
Finally, Service Apartments Noida offer outdoor areas such as terraces or gardens that can be used to relax after a long day at work or entertain guests over dinner parties. These areas are often equipped with stylish furniture pieces so you can enjoy al fresco dining in style!
Conclusion
Service apartments offer a great way to enjoy luxury living with cozy comfort. The amenities provided are plentiful and include everything from high-end furniture pieces, modern appliances and fixtures to gyms, swimming pools and outdoor areas for entertaining. All in all, service apartments provide the perfect combination of luxury living with all the comforts of home. Whether you’re looking for a place to stay during business trips or a luxurious getaway for your family, service apartments will ensure that you have everything you need for a comfortable stay
Source Url- https://ibusinessday.com/service-apartments-delhi-offering-cozy-comfort-at-affordability/
submitted by srvcaptdelhi to u/srvcaptdelhi [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:13 ChangeFunny713 What should I do when he doesn’t want to talk for closure at the moment?

I have been with my boyfriend for more than a year. We weren’t the most compatible in terms of our personalities (he is sensitive and I can be very straightforward, and since we’re both assertive, it has led to a lot of intense fights). We finally broke it off recently because our fights got too intense, he also has been losing hope that this relationship will work out since he feels like I have not properly changed to become a better person. After the breakup, I was very devastated and started envisioning how I could have been a better girlfriend. I realized I love him much more than I did, and I truly want another chance to be a better person. We have not spoken for 6 days now, he wanted space and has been actively avoiding me, which hurts me a lot. I wanted to talk to him so I can tell him I wanna be a better person, and I hope he can forgive me just like how I also put myself in his shoes and forgave him for the things he said to me.
The sad thing is we live in the same house so we have to actively avoid each other (we do live with another roommate and we have separate rooms so it’s less awkward). I keep getting emotional breakdowns and severe anxiety because he would avoid me and run away from me if I try to approach him. Our mutual friend said he is hurt and needs space but I also feel like his friends are telling him to move on from this relationship. I’m not ready to move on and still wanted a chance later on in our lives to be together. I know that he needs the space and I need the space to heal and reflect, but this break has been toring me apart rather than healing me. Since we live in the same house, I can’t focus on anything properly without thinking about how much I’m scared of the fact that he will resent me… Deep inside I don’t want to move on, and I think he does. His ignorance towards me and the ways he does thing imply he fully wants to move on. I want a chance to be able to have a civil conversation so I can move on properly, because right now I just keep blaming myself and hoping for a future where I can be a better person. I don’t know if I can ask him to talk because I want to respect his space, but this anxiety and pain is killing me right now. Please help me - anyone who has been in this situation please say something. I’m very desparate
submitted by ChangeFunny713 to BreakUps [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:13 mollyk8317 How screwed am I?

So for background I have dealt w bed bugs once before, way back in about 2008 at an old apartment. Anyways, so I'm doing laundry at work, bedding to be exact, and I work as an independent contractor home health aide. This woman I work for almost never leaves her home, however a few other women besides myself work for her. So anyway as I'm taking bedding out of dryer to fold, I see a bug lodged in a space between the lint trap n outer edge (there's a lip there not sure why) anyway it took me a min to get this bug out but I am 99% positive it was an adult female bed bug. Unfortunately it going thru the dryer n the process of me pulling it out of that space really dicked up the bug. It did not appear to have fed recently, as when i bagged it i squished it (since i know how hard they can be to squish n sure enough it was quite hard to squish it..) when I did a cpl of smaller looking light brown pieces came out of it.. I didn't hammer on the thing since I knew my employer would want a look at it but she took it from me before I could take a photo.. not that a photo might have helped much by that point.. Anyway I did a cursory look around her bed during day time n didn't see any obv signs of blood or feces from them.. i guess my question is this... if she does have bed bugs mildly, how likely is it that I might now have them from working over there? Of course today all my clothes went in to washer n drier on high heat as soon as I got home but I'm worried about before now... Sorry for the novel but thanks for any advice!
submitted by mollyk8317 to Bedbugs [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:11 NRCsummaries Trey double

3/31
Today, after snatching the mask and hat of Crowley, Jacob duct taped and super glued him to the wall of his office. Yuki and Jericho soon came by with the blue chicken that got several people sick to feed him. I dont know what's happened after that
Sane Yuu was kidnapped by Diasomnia students!! But not to worry! It was just a roleplay thing because Grim wanted to play the part of a prince and rescue her from a. dragon
Vil's concert went off without a hitch! It went well! Thank you for joining!
Yesterday, myself and Trey made poffins for the pokemon. I was giving em away earlier, but it seems Azul have taken them all. So go bug him for your poffins
Ace got a pokemon today! A torchic. He got in trouble for it lol, but it soon "evolved.." whatever that means.
Someone lost their magic pen in Diasomnia! It was found outside of Malleus' room, and doesn't belong to him, Lillia, Silver or Sebek. It's probably still in the possession of the same Yuu if it's yours!
And now for the title of this post. A strange double of Trey was spotted! He has the same hairstyle and color, but lacks his glasses and has a different eye color. Its speculated that hes apart of the mafia. Let's keep an eye out for this dude!
A weird plant is in Ignihyde! It has Bob captured.
submitted by NRCsummaries to NightRavenCollege [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:10 AutoModerator [I HAVE] 123 Profit Course by Aidan Booth CHEAP!!! DM me for further information Discord Server with all courses 99% OFF original price Quick Sale Telegram: t. me/PliatsikG Discord: PLIATSIK#0227

[I HAVE] 123 Profit Course by Aidan Booth CHEAP!!! DM me for further information Discord Server with all courses 99% OFF original price Quick Sale Telegram: t. me/PliatsikG Discord: PLIATSIK#0227
The Course includes:

• DASHBOARD
• START HERE
• REGISTRATION & UPDATES
• EARLY BIRD TRAINING
• CORE TRAINING
• OFFICE HOURS
• CONTESTS
• SUPPORT
• BONUSES
• SOFTWARE TRAINING
• ACCOUNTABILITY & MINDSET

You can find all of them on - Our Discord Server
Discord: PLIATSIK#0227
Telegram: t. me/PliatsikG (Remove the space between "t." and "me" for the link to work properly or search directly for my telegram name: PliatsikG).

50+ Vouches from clients
750+ Members on our Discord Server
20+ TB of rare and known courses
https://preview.redd.it/bywzhc53t1ra1.png?width=808&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3a0a47410f5590e7f4c511c115170d4c22102fa
submitted by AutoModerator to top10courses [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 05:00 Uesnordun Despite being the first black ASPD offender in Ireland I never victim blame and took full responsibility

Since I was born in 1994 and growing up I noticed i was different from every black kids, I never followed social norms or taboo, I started watching porn from the age of 9-10, I think my ASPD developed from when I was a toddler beating the pulp out of my 2 months old baby brother, and at age 3 setting fire to a whole apartment or at the age of 6 when I had an accident and my brain and face had to be sewed, I once seen the sky open and horses coming down at the age of 7. My late dad never cared about my mum and us, and when she moved to Ireland I was with my late grandmother for 4 years, and with that period was abused by my uncle and aunts. I changed secondary schools like 3 times in the space of 11 months. I never got into trouble with the law during my teenage years (luckily i did not get charged for beating the pulp out of my class mate and only got 3 days suspension; I also got counselling for depression and bullying). I was a prolific failure in studies and courses i applied for after leaving secondary school, failing two plc level 5 courses, doing a level 4 course and also failing it and multiple level 3 courses. I never have the skills to talk to girls and women, and cognitively impaired. I first came into contact with the criminal justice system at age 25 (I was homeless for a month and started taking all kind of drugs and got into smoking cigarette (my biggest regret)). The sexual assault took place in a psychiatric hospital/mental home we were both patients. I pleaded guilty and was co-operative with guards/police and probation service (she did not make a victim impact statement iirc and was likely to not get convicted until one morning i woke up and took a knife into the police station) and I even told inmates in non-sex offenders prison about it and all they did was laugh and take pity of me same with when i was in sex offenders-only prison. With all that said, I never used my diagnosis of ASPD (Anti-Social Personality Disorder) likely the first in Irish Criminal Justice System for a black person as an excuse or victim blame. I have not taken my psychotic medication for 6 months now and I hope i become a better person in future.
submitted by Uesnordun to SexOffenderSupport [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:56 Impossible_Shock8625 Anyone have a bad experience with Retriever Towing? They towed my car from an assigned parking space

I live in Autumn Chase Apartments, and have an assigned parking spot that costs 60+ dollars a month. The Property Management requires us to sign up with ParkM even though we pay for the spot monthly.
After receiving a random (very clearly stated LAST - even though it was the first) warning from the tow truck company back in August, I registered my parking space with ParkM and received an email confirmation for doing so.
I thought that was the end of it, but nope! I went out to go to the grocery store today and found my vehicle missing from my assigned parking spot.
Called Retriever towing and they're disinterested in my story, and won't tell me what parking spot it was towed from. Of course the Leasing Agency is after hours now, too.
Digging up all kinds of resources on the company name you can see they've been embroiled in bad press and lawsuits in Oregon for years. How does a company like this stay in business?
Any suggestions for recourse? I've emailed Property Management and I'm waiting to hear back from them.
submitted by Impossible_Shock8625 to vancouverwa [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:53 DEUSNOWA Thought do a spicy fanfic for april fools.

snice I like to keep shit tame, most of the time today I say fuck that.
we going hardcore.
this is called the lol love hotel.
after a long day, Ryze lay next to to his beloved newlywed wife Zeri, her eyes glowed in the dark like two beauitful fireflies, the passion was in the air and the hot wall slamming sex could be heard from the next room as Mord pumped Sona full of lquid dream destroyer , on the oppsite you could hear aatrox moaning in pleasure from Kayle whipping him and the floor below you could Yorick and Gwen going out like rabbits and in room next yorick and gwen you could the loud crys of viego as wife refused to make love as she was on her monthy.
it was prefect, Ryze knew booking a love hotel was a great idea, Ryze put his hands on Zeri's thighs and then he leaned into her neck and whispered softly into her ear "its nerf of nothing" , in a instant Zeri loins filled with exictment , she was so exicted she sparked Ryze's dick and this made ryze harder than Mord's steel armor, Ryze suddely grabbed zeri waist and started thrusting at speed, the fast he got the more static Zeri out put, suddley due an Electric charge all the power in the building was going wild, Ryze and Zeri where going fucking nuts in differnt postions, the mother fuckers where flying across the room, they shagged on the floor, they shagged on the bed, the shagged on the wall , they fucked so hard the microwave went flying out the window smacking some dude at rito in the head(he would go on vgu rammus into femboy mage) , the sex got even more out of control as the floor started to crack , Yorick and gwen noticed this, Yorick grabbed his shovel and smack the wall right next to him in and went into viego room, suddly ryze and zeri's bed came fcrashing down from 1st floor on to the ground floor.
Ryze and zeri totaly oblvious to there surrounding where still going, Yorick started laughing as it was most wild shit he ever seen, Gwen then looked at yorick and said "shoud we try that", so yorick looked her dead in the eye, picked her up and started banging her like a turret, viego got even more depressed as he witnessed yorick and Gwen slamming though the walls taking out a few pillar, ryze and zeri started doing the same, suddely mord and sona came crashing down though the floor due the pillar support , viego cried like a bitch seeing how much fun everyone else was having.
"Isolde, why can't we do this kinda stuff" viego whined , "I already told you, I got camps and not the fucking mood, not my fault you booked a day when I was on my period" Isolde said angery.
meanwhile on the first floor Aatrox was tied to the bed and Kayle was on top she was kissing him intensely , the had gone from whipping to somthing else, Aatrox was fired up, kayle got the ropes and Aatrox grabbed Kayle and twisted her around so he was on top and decied to thrust her so hard the floor collapsed , thankfully to empty room, everyone was going nuts, so nuts in fact they where failing to notice the hotel was falling apart, the finshing blow was done by Jarvan on the top floor with Shyvana as they fucked so hard the entire hotel came crashing down.
Viego looked around as the ruins of the hotel and noticed not one person gave a flying fuck and as he looked into the corner in the distance where a room would been he saw Garen and Katarina doing spin sex sending the debris of the hotel flying.
Viego was mythed and confused "isolde lets go to shacdonalds, i'm hungry" he said sheeplishly "honey thats the smartest thing to have come out you're mouth today" Isolde said pleased , so Viego and Isolde went off to get food, meanwhile the couples kept going out at until it they too fucked off for food, Mord , Sona , Yorick and Gwen went to a pizza joint, Aatrox and Kayle went to a night club and Ryze and Zeri went back to there swamp and had a BBQ with friends Azir , Sivir , Kass , Kaisa and Aphelios, life was good.
The end
then Aurlion sol and Bard got high on space dust.
submitted by DEUSNOWA to DarkinFolk [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:51 Honest_Forever_5064 23m. $500. No car. Getting put out in 21 days. No friends or family to rely on for shelter. (USA)

about me: 23m, 5'11, 130lbs. The 'skinny nerd' type who doesn't have any sort of survival skills. I consider myself to be a bit smart and mentally resilient. Spent the past 5 years working just enough to pay rent and sit in my room deeply unhappy with society and life. I have a backpack full of clean clothes that will last a week at a time, some toiletries, and a laptop/phone. I'm considering leaving my laptop with my brother, as it's expensive ($1500), but I also think it would be useful for remote work.
Here are 6 ideas I came up with today. Check out the second idea if you want to save some time and see the idea I'm leaning the most towards.
First idea: Look into homeless shelters. I did some research and apparently homeless shelters have a variety of problems. They're prone to being full and they don't prioritize shelter to young, physically/health men. Your belongings might end up missing.
Second idea: Sleep outside. Buy a hammock/tent/bivy and find a secluded place to rest every night. I like this idea because I can do it in the small town I lived in, and I can keep my job. There's plenty of wooded area, especially next to the surburban neighborhoods I'm currently in. Of course, I'm worried about being robbed or worse, but I'm not sure how likely that is to happen. I'll be scoping out areas in the next few days. On paper, this plan seems viable, but I might be missing something. I'm also worried that my camping gear might be stolen if I leave it when I go for work.
Third idea: People talk about living in storage units. I did some research, and it seems they go for $75/$150/$300 a month. I could find work, and once I confirm a job I could stay in one of those and pay 'rent' until I generate enough money to move into an apartment. Problems: It's illegal, and people generally consider it unsafe/dangerous, I'm assuming due to lack of ventilation and temperature control. I'm interested in the idea, but I don't think it would work. If I got caught and I got kicked out, I'd be in a very tough spot.
Fourth idea: I heard some talk on reddit about renting office spaces. Again, this is not permitted, but it provides good shelter at a low price. Follows the same plan as the previous idea. I looked into some online, but before I start calling I wanted to get this post out first.
Fifth idea: Look for a roof and sleep on top of it. People on reddit seem to love this idea, but I'm not too sure about it. It does seem like no one would go on top of a roof, but it seems very illegal and I'm not sure how often people go on roofs at night.
Sixth idea: Embrace the vagabond lifestyle and keep moving across the country. Develop remote skills like programming/writing. I haven't given too much thought to this one yet.
submitted by Honest_Forever_5064 to almosthomeless [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:47 Adventurous-Plant419 Michael Alcock King, Joshua Myers, Andrew Cash, Mark Essick, with overt deliberate negligence on the part of the entire Board of Sonoma County Supervisors, stole 6 years of my life, after their employee Virgil Smith almost killed me and caused me serious injury.

I just want people to know that the Sonoma County government is corrupt. They spent 186 million dollars on a "new courthouse" that is 163k square feet, which works out to $1,100 per square foot, which is over double the second most expensive building I could find was, and over four times the average price per square foot of palaces and museums. And it's just going to look like a giant portable. This is to house some of the most corrupt people in this County, who all make $200-350+k per year (I am including their benefits in that, but not their pension). The entire DA's Office has a vendetta against Civil Rights in general, and will literally knowingly commit criminal violations of laws for the purpose of covering up serious criminal misconduct on the part of Sonoma County employees.
Lynda Hopkins took money from the law enforcement unions, and turns a willfully blind eye to it.
The County Office of Legal Counsel is literally a crime syndicate.
In 2015, the Sheriff's Office had a veritable torture ring in the jail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izcHIv5Y4z8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYrGChrW5HM&list=TLPQMzAwMzIwMjMv0QAOPDy1Lw&index=2
This is just the tip of the iceberg. They lied about the existence of these videos, and "lost" the one where they gave one of the inmates internal bleeding, with a knee to their back.
There was a lawsuit about it. It was called the "Yard Counseling Case". There are news articles about it.
There was an official, written policy, called "Yard Counseling", later its name was changed to "Behavior Counseling" which dictated that for arbitrary punitive measures, Sheriff's Office personnel should extract inmates from their cells individually (which meant slamming their heads onto the door frames on the way out and other abuse), and isolate them, and putting them into "pain compliance" techniques (literally, by definition, torture) for extended periods of time while "counseling" them, which meant wearing no name tags, ski masks and riot gear, carrying a shotgun with them, and insulting them in explicit language for over 20 minutes.
This official written policy was acknowledged by Rob Giordano in a video, where he lies that no inmates where injured, uploaded to YouTube in 2018, when they finally addressed this official written policy, and the practice of torturing inmates without reasonable cause (leading exercise routines, for example).
In 2021, they saw one of the victims of this torture ring, who had sued them and had won, at a peaceful protest, and shot him with a grenade launcher while hiding on a rooftop in the face with a crowd control grenade, which exploded on impact and caused horrific injury that I don't care to describe.
In 2017, I was almost killed by application of a "carotid hold" / lateral vascular neck restraint, by a sheriff's deputy, for literally no reason. A knee was placed on my lower back while I was on the ground on my stomach as well, which caused a serious injury to my kidney, which was the worst injury of my life. I have also been diagnosed with an organic brain injury and cognitive impairment. I was tested for the same type of cognitive impairment before the incident and there is a marked difference, and I have about 30 pages describing the differences I've noticed / troubles I've had in my cognitive functioning. There was no probable cause to arrest me, and I was polite and compliant with all the instructions given to me, and this was confirmed by witnesses. I was punished for invoking my right to remain silent, then my arm was grabbed and yanked up behind me, and then a carotid hold was applied because my body pivoted after the deputy grabbed and yanked my arm.
This occurred UNDER A CAMERA and IN FRONT OF WITNESSES. I called the Sheriff's Office the next day said I want to "make an official complaint in writing". I was transferred to Captain of Internal Affairs, Captain Mark Essick. I repeated my request, verbatim. He responded, verbatim: "We don't do that. Why don't you tell me what happened." I did. I told him it happened right under a camera. He said "The camera can't record." I asked for confirmation. He said the cameras "Don't have recording technology installed."
I asked the County for a claim form. They ignored my request, and instructed me to report the incident to IOLERO. IOLERO requested I meet with Internal Affairs, and I said fine.
Sgt. Andy Cash called me and scheduled me for a meeting at the Sheriff's den. I was made to walk first and guided upstairs to a meeting room, and then patted down for weapons, and the interview was recorded. For 75 minutes I was deposed about happened. He asked me repeatedly about my mental state after the incident. I admitted that I was upset after the incident, and he acted like that justified the whole incident. He explicitly promised to interview the 4 deputies who witnessed the event in addition to the 2 deputies who participated, as well as the arresting officer (who I told him would confirm that I was polite and cooperative), which he agreed "would confirm [my] demeanor", and a bystander witness I told him about.
I complained to IOLERO director Jerry Threet. Mr. Threet agreed that that was inappropriate, then resigned without reviewing the investigation.
For about 4 years review of the investigation was put on hold because IOLERO staff quit, and when more staff was hired, they complained of being understaffed. They had a budget of over a million dollars but only had 2 employees. They only reviewed one case per four months. And they put off "backlogged" cases and focused on new cases. My complaint was finally reviewed by Interim Director Garrick Byers who clearly stated that the investigation was not conducted appropriately. I have the letter from him. That still has never been made public.
After the interview with Internal Affairs, I corresponded with Lynda Hopkins, and she refused to give her opinion on the matter. I specifically complained that the carotid hold was being used recklessly, and it is a dangerous technique. This was in 2018. She forwarded me to Janell Crane, who then had me meet with Kristi Schultz.
I contacted the DA's Office and spoke to Richard Celli (who made $346k in 2017, and has gunned down two unarmed people, and was convicted by a jury in one of the civil cases brought against him by one of the victim's family, but the sentence was overturned by a judge, while working for the SRPD). The first time I spoke to Mr. Celli, he told me that another law enforcement agency should take my case. After that first time, him and the rest of the DA's Office openly refused to comply with the Victims' Rights Laws (CA Con Art. 1 S. 28), and the "policies" (which are legally binding under CA Con Art 5 S. 13) of the Attorney General stating clearly that they are to take complaints from victims if it can't be resolved with the department.
After the first talk with Mr. Celli, I called Rohnert Park Police as I was instructed, and they 3-way called the Sheriff's office and then transferred me. I spent about 30 minutes reporting the incident to a deputy, and he asked me questions in a fair manner. I called RPPD back and talked to the arresting officer and he positively clearly confirmed that I was "polite, calm, compliant, and cooperative" (or something nearly verbatim, I can't remember exactly any more).
Andrew Cash called me the next day, at precisely 7:00 AM. He told me he was driving. He was extremely confrontational with me. He said "There were 6 deputies [referring to the two who used excessive force on me, and 4 witness deputies]. You were combative." This was false. He had only interviewed one of the 4 witness deputies, and the other 3 had provided written statements. They said that they had witnessed force being used, that they had not participated in the use of force to the best of their memory, and that I "did not appear to be resisting". But again, he had promised explicitly to interview the 4 deputy witnesses, and the arresting officer
Internal Affairs exonerated the officers. The letter was signed by Eddie Engram, captain of Internal Affairs. I called Mr. Engram, and had an hour long conversation with him, and he told me to contact Sgt. Cash after April 1st.
I filed a federal claim on the last day that it was due.
Mr. Cash referred me to Legal Counselor, Kara Abelson.
Ms. Abelson spent a year and a half refusing to comply with the Public Records Act, the Rules of Procedure, and the Rules of Professional Conduct. She refused to provide me documents that I was entitled to under law, including the incident report written by Deputies Jacquelin Fazzio and Virgil Smith, and the recorded interviews that he promised he would conduct, and stated pretty clearly that he had conducted.
Kara Abelson spent a year and a half trying to claim that my federal complaint was time barred by 1 day when it wasn't. The judge (Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers) entertained this and forced me to respond SEVEN TIMES, before she finally admitted that the "law wouldn't allow [her] to dismiss my complaint".
After a year and a half, Kara Abelson finally withdrew from the case after I started citing the Rules of Professional Conduct to her that require her to resign or withdraw from the case rather than defend a civil case where defense isn't warranted. Nobody had disputed any of the allegations I had made. In fact, Eddie Engram had confirmed that what I said happened was not disputed by the evidence.
At some point around this time, either before or after Ms. Abelson withdrew, the 2 incident reports written by the two deputies, the written statements by 3 of the 4 witness deputies, and the recorded interviews with me, the 2 deputies who assaulted me, and 1 of the eye witness deputies, were provided, along with various other records from the facility. In the recorded interview, and the incident report, the deputies admitted that Virgil Smith had applied the carotid hold.
I had also reported the incident to the State Attorney General Public Inquiry Unite (Lupe Zinzin). She had told me, over and over and over, that the local DA's are required to take complaints from civilians in these situations. She refused to call the DA's Office, though. The DA's Office (Richard Celli, Mark Azzouni, David Kahl) refused to take a complaint from me. They (including the receptionists) hung up on me every time I called after no more than 2 minutes, for no reason, transferred me to dead lines, never returned any voicemails I managed to leave, told me explicitly that if I send a complaint, they will throw it away, and didn't care, at all, what the laws were. The receptionists also refuse to provide their names. The Attorney General's Office told me to send them a complaint, so I did. The DA's Office acknowledged receiving the complaint. But later said that they did not have a record of it, meaning they threw it away.
The Attorney General's Office finally agreed to take a complaint from me. It sat on their desk for a year. I finally called them, concerned that evidence was being destroyed, and left a voicemail for Casey Hallinan requesting that they request copies of the physical evidence from the Sheriff's Office. Literally 2 days after that voicemail, a letter was sent to me signed by Sharon Loughner with Casey Hallinan CC'ed on the letter, stating that they would "take no action", and blamed the incident on me. I had not received the letter though, and called and spoke to Ms. Hallinan, who was extremely rude. After that, the Attorney General's Office hang up on me as soon as they find out it's me, for no reason. There has since been a bystander witness who saw the whole thing, and it has come to light that the cameras did record, that no upgrades were ever performed like Ms. Abelson alleged, the cameras do continuously record (as of 2019), and they just lied through their teeth about the camera for 4 straight years. The Attorney General's Office does not care. They violate the laws, and do not care what the laws are.
Sonoma County Office of Legal Counsel attorney Michael King took over after Ms. Abelson withdrew. Right off the bat, Mr. King told me that my motions were deficient - a contention he has repeated frequently, since then. I asked him how. He changed the subject, and to this day has NEVER given any explanation as to how any of my motions are deficient.
He continued to claim that my claim was time barred, filing frivolous motions, in blatant violation of the rules of professional conduct, after I cited the rules to him, constituting explicit legal misconduct.
As I said, the judge finally agreed to open Discovery after a year and a half of full time work trying to fight for my right to not be nearly murdered for no reason.
Lawyers do not take these cases unless there is undeniable proof of blatant guilt, along with undeniable proof of catastrophic injury. Multiple law firms have confirmed that it takes over a million dollars worth of legal work to get these cases to trial.
The judge also promised me a pro bono attorney "if you make it past summary judgment".
The judge scheduled us for Alternative Dispute Resolution hearing with a magistrate judge. Mr. King elicited an offer from me, which I spent about 2 weeks working on, trying to make it as agreeable as possible. But then for the hearing, his written offer was to waive charging me his attorneys fees. The judge confirmed that there was no legal basis for him to do that - it would be illegal. He had been ordered to participate in this hearing, and there was a legal obligation under the Rules of Procedure to try in good faith to settle the case. He violated the order and the rule of procedure (26 (f)).
All of my motions were completely ignored for no reason.
Mr. King / Defendant Virgil Smith lied about the cameras. They said "Denies the existence of cameras capable of recording in the vicinity", in writing, under oath. They never disputed that he put his knee on top of my back with all his weight on it.
Mr. King refused to comply with his Discovery obligations. I had to file about 4 different motions pertaining to their refusal to comply with the laws regarding disclosure of evidence.
Upon receiving an official Discovery request for records of camera equipment, I received a letter signed under by Mr. King (nearly 4 years after the incident) stating that the cameras CAN RECORD. But stating "tasks must be performed" to start the recording function, and stating that all records pertaining to the equipment that was installed at the time HAD BEEN DESTROYED (literally a federal and state crime, a civil tort violation, and a sanctionable act of legal misconduct).
Mr. King refused to schedule any of the witnesses for deposition, demanded MY deposition BEFORE he would even schedule the two deputies who assaulted me, even though I had been requesting depositions with other witnesses for over a month, and refused to schedule anyone else, he refused to answer interrogatories, he refused to provide copies of the policies from the time of the incident. He tried to pass off a weird spreadsheet with the word camera on it as proof that upgrades had been done to the cameras. He refused to provide complete training records for the deputies. He refused to provide details about the training. He refused to provide blueprints of the facility, refused to provide photos of the cameras at the location, refused to provide still images showing which direction the cameras were pointing, refused to provide photos of the deputies so I could schedule depositions efficiently.
The judge erroneously dismissed my Equal Protection claims, construing them as Due Process and Employment Discrimination claims, which are different types of claims than Equal Protection claims against a government actor. The government cannot arbitrarily treat anyone disparately. The Court also dismissed my "Monell" claim against the municipality for their "policies, customs, or practices", but left me leave to amend that claim. And she waited until Discovery opened over 1.5 years into litigation, to do this, forcing me to amend the complaint DURING DISCOVERY which was only open for a limited amount of time, instead of any point in the 1.5 years prior to that.
In the recorded interview with Andrew Cash and one of the witness deputies, she spontaneously states that Mr. Cash instructed her to review the written statements made by the two deputies who assaulted me prior to the interview. Another deputy witness confirmed that Mr. Cash had instructed her to review the written reports by the two deputies who assaulted me prior to her providing Mr. Cash with a written statement as well.
The judge finally retaliated against me, without rational basis, for filing motions, which I had filed because I was being illegally obstructed from preserving evidence, by withdrawing leave to amend regarding the "Monell" claim (I had stated a clear Monell claim to begin with, but the judge literally has an aversion to reading, and relies on guessing, and is biased against pro se litigants; I am summarizing well over 100 pages, if not well over double that, of motions, objections, and replies and the judge's responsive orders).
She did however, finally schedule a hearing with a Discovery referee magistrate. All my motions (and the months of work I was required to do dictated by the various rules) was completely disregarded, and both me and Mr. King were given 2 pages each (double spaced) to go over discovery issues, even though I had filed about 4 different motions about various issues, and he hadn't filed ANY, at that time.
During conference I was required to do in accordance with the Rules, Mr. King repeatedly tried to establish that I had committed crimes during the course of conferring which was my legal obligation, without having any rational basis to believe what he was trying to establish. He demanded evidence that would exist, and he kept repeating every lie he could come up with to the judge. The judge would either get annoyed at me if I addressed any of Mr. King's baseless accusations, or take his statements at face value for being 100% true.
Mr. King finally "compromised" and agreed to schedule depositions with me (as long as Mr. King wanted to) and the two deputies who had assaulted me (for 25 minutes each or something) all simultaneously, but refused to schedule anyone else, even though this was grossly advantageous to him. One of the eye witness deputies later confirmed that he had "consulted" her over 4 times prior to the trial. During this deposition, Mr. King asked me where a family member of mine works. He had spent about 30-40 minutes trying to convince me that I can tell him anything, that the entire record was designated confidential, that I had nothing to worry about - and at a deposition, you are obligated to answer the questions unless they are harassing. Mr. King also requested contact information for counselors from over 10 years ago, and that was the only question I didn't answer - I told him to provide the request in writing. At some point after that, I told Mr. King to not contact my family member at her workplace, and Mr. King responded "unless you fully and completely cooperate" with his request for contact information for counselors from 10 years+ ago.
At the hearing, the Discovery Magistrate (Donna M. Ryu) discussed matters only with Mr. King, without including me. He told her that the 4 eye witness deputies "saw nothing" and "weren't there" (verbatim) trying to get her to deny me my request to take their deposition. She asked him if he would get them to sign fresh "sworn declarations", "under oath" (Judge Ryu's words, verbatim) stating this. Mr. King said yes, absolutely, he would. Judge Ryu asked me "Would that be okay?" I said "No." She started laughing, and asked me why, and I explained that I had explicitly described various interactions with them that had taken place while the carotid hold was still being applied to me, and that they had stated in their written statements that they had witnessed force being used, and that was "not resisting". She confirmed that this was all true with Mr. King and that he already knew all of this, and ordered him to cooperate with scheduling them for deposition.
After that, they went back to discussing matters only with eachother, and I was excluded from discussion. This was an hour long hearing, and at about the 45 minute mark, Mr. King was again lying to the magistrate judge, and when he had finished, I interjected, "That's not true". Judge Ryu shouted "Stop! Stop stop stop stop stop!" And then very assertively explained to me the importance of not interrupting people for the convenience of the court reporter / transcriber. I was excluded from the rest of the hearing.
At some point at either this hearing or the next one, I cited the legal requirement for the parties to disclose contact information for witnesses. I cited the rule of procedure. Judge Ryu responded, "Mr. King is a lawyer!" as if that alone justified his refusal to provide me contact information for witnesses.
Mr. King refused to provide both written statements from the eye witness deputies, and to schedule them for deposition, and stated that if he provided written statements, they would be copied and pasted versions of the same statements previously provided, signed under oath (nowhere saying that they "saw nothing" or "weren't there").
Mr. King kept threatening to go to my family member's workplace unless I provided him contact information for counselors from 10+ years ago, DURING a DEPOSITION, without him providing any written request for the information.
He also interfered with scheduling the witnesses for deposition, with the Court reporter that I had hired, disregarded the schedule that I had set, and set them each for 30 minutes, which raised the cost of deposition from an estimated about $700 to about $4,000, and said this was my one and only chance.
The Federal Pro Bono Project / the Justice & Diversity Center is an organization that receives seven million dollars a year in public funding and is under contract with the Federal District Court to work with the Court to provide legal consultation to pro se litigants. I had about 19 appointments with them, about 18 with Abby Herzberg, and 1 with Rosemarie Maliekel. Ms. Herzberg was precisely 15 minutes late to every single appointment, repeatedly gave me horrible advice ("just wait", do nothing, "don't file this", despite admitting that the entire motion was valid, directly causing excessive delay and the spoliation of crucial evidence). She also yelled at me aggressively on two occasions because I had brought up state laws, which were being currently violated against me, because the Court had dismissed my "state claims" because Sonoma County refused to supply with a state tort claim form when I first asked, reasoning that was not relevant to the state laws being currently violated against me. After Ms. Herzberg yelled at me the second time, I requested an appointment with Ms. Maliekel. Ms. Maliekel spent the entire appointment ranting at me about irrelevant issues, and kept talking over me and interrupting me. I was polite but eventually asked "can I finish what I was saying?" She responded "No!" and kept ranting at me.
I had repeatedly asked about how to properly get medical evidence, and about expert witnesses. Ms. Herzberg ignored my questions and spent nearly the entirety of almost every single appointment reading through the rules, without letting me speak at all, even to summarize the relevant sections of the rules that I had read.
On a video on their webpage (on the Court's website, because they are a "partner project" with the Court), Abby Herzberg explicitly demonstrates a clear understanding of the fact that the Court provides funding for expert witnesses, despite ignoring my questions about and spending nearly the entirety of almost every single appointment either reading rules or pretending to.
Discovery was closed.
Mr. King rehashed the legally baseless and frivolous "time barred" claim in a Motion for Summary Judgment. I was required to respond to it twice. I was required to answer all his "undisputed material facts" under threat of terminating my entire case, but he refused to answer mine. He lied over and over to the judges. As I said, the judge ruled that the laws "wouldn't allow her to" dismiss my entire case and rejected his Motion for Summary Judgement.
The Court ordered the Federal Pro Bono Project (FPBP) to put me on a list for attorneys seeking clients. Ms. Herzberg told me that if I filed any motions, that the FPBP would not cooperate with the Court's order, until 1 month before my trial, instead of 6 months before. She also said that a law firm had reached out to them about my case over a month prior to that, and that the staff at the FPBP had not followed up. My filing privileges were then revoked by the Court.
An attorney, David Ratner, reached out to me, and scheduled an initial consultation, over Zoom, at which he stated he "hates cops", and gave a showing of being enthusiastic. I explicitly told him that I wanted to make sure we were on the same page as far as what to "aim for". I told him that I had been working for FIVE YEARS, that I had almost died, that I had suffered two different extremely serious injuries. I told him that what I asked for was consistent with the most similar case (the Esa Wroth case of 2013) that I knew of (an ask of three million dollars). This was coincidental. I was not aware of the Esa Wroth case when I came up with that number. I agonized over that, and spent a lot of time trying to come up with a fair amount, and described the methods I used to come up with that number in detail in court documents. Mr. Ratner explicitly agreed to aim for that.
Mr. Ratner, and his partner, Shelley Mollineaux, who was set to represent me at trial under Mr. Ratner's supervision, then both went dark for over a month. They ignored my emails, voicemails, and messages that I left with their receptionists. There was a hearing, and then Mr. Ratner emailed me demanding "all the documents" that I had. I had over 50 gb of files across thousands of files, and spent about a month working with his paralegals sending them batches of files, and providing all the information they asked me for. Mr. Ratner forwarded me an email from Mr. King where King accused me of violating a court order regarding providing medical providers and the physical addresses of my entire family and my friends, which was false -- the Court had ordered me to provide him CONTACT information, at a second hearing, which wasn't significant, and I had fully and completely complied in good faith with all the Court's orders. Mr. Ratner accused me of not sending him "anything", after I had spent at least several weeks with his paralegals sending them batches of files and information, and he simultaneously threatened to ask the judge for leave to withdraw.
There had been major delays with medical evaluation due in large part to Covid, as well as delayed discovery of brain injury, which is very common, and other factors.
With trial set, Mr. Ratner forwarded me an offer from Defendants for $5,000. Upon discussion (which was 100% in email because he refused to talk over the phone and Ms. Mollineaux completely ignored me), he accused me of not doing Discovery right. I pointed him to the video I referred to earlier, which I had found since Mr. Ratner took my case, but wasn't aware of when I was interacting with the FPBP, where the FPBP (Abby Herzberg), and various District Judges from the Court I was litigating in, state that it is general policy (and it is official policy under the Court's General Order 25) to REOPEN DISCOVERY when a pro bono attorney comes onto the case, and to FUND DEPOSITION AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES.
Mr. Ratner stated he "won't file any motions" and ultimately elected to withdraw from the case over fulfill his legal obligations under the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court thanked him and granted him permission to withdraw. The FPBP refused to put me back on the list. I was forced into trial BY MYSELF, at 1-2 months prior to trial, after 2-3 months of my time being completely wasted by Mr. Ratner and his law firm.
I went through the appropriate legal process to submit an expert witness. The Court, as usual, completely ignored my motions, but allowed me to use him after I went through the entire legal process, and paid him thousands of dollars without knowing if I would be granted permission or not, and provided the Court a report stating that the carotid hold was ILLEGAL unless the subject exhibited "assaultive behavior" and that Defendants had never alleged any behavior of mine that constituted "assaultive behavior" (under POST Basic). The expert was a Master level instructor at a police academy and former SWAT.
Mr. King provided his pre-trial disclosures, and it contained a document from Rohnert Park police department which had been extensively redacted on the copy that they had provided to me. The new copy contained the contact information for the bystander witness. I called him, and he confirmed that he saw the entire thing, that I had never yelled at the deputies before the first deputy grabbed my arm, and that I was not resisting at any point in time. I told the judge this. She had me call him at a hearing, and both me and Mr. King were allowed a couple of minutes to ask him questions, where he refused to admit that I was even "wiggling" when Mr. King badgered him.
The judge then refused to allow him to appear over Zoom, and refused to summon him to the trial.
At the trial, the Judge accused me falsely of firing my attorney, and explicitly prohibited me from telling the jury that the Defendants had LIED about the camera's ability to record. She explicitly prohibited me from submitting scientific evidence about the carotid hold. She allowed Mr. King to make extremely defamatory false remarks about me and my past which had a huge impact on the jury's perception of things. At a pretrial hearing, we had gone over about 110 documents that I wanted to present at the trial. She vetted about 40 as admissible at the hearing, but at the trial she only let me submit about 5. Defendants were allowed to submit a SECOND expert witness, both of whom worked for the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office. The first was Andrew Cash. The second was James Naugle who had been disclosed literally a week before trial, without a report, and without allowing me to take his deposition. She refused to allow me to ask Mr. Naugle about case laws, or about information pertaining to the carotid hold. The Court refused to summon any of my treating physicians, whom I had provided the names and contact information for in my disclosures at the end of Discovery and some in my initial disclosures, and I had complied with Mr. King's written requests for information or objected within the boundaries of the law, in good faith, and complied with the Court's orders, in good faith.
I had informed the Court that I was scheduled for medical evaluations for brain injury AFTER THE TRIAL. The Court completely ignored this.
So it was my word against theirs. 5 years, at the time of the mistrial, to get a mockery of a trial, and have the jurors' time completely wasted. The jury wrote me a letter thanking me or something, but awarded me nothing.
I was diagnosed with organic brain injury after the trial. I had a similar test prior to the incident and had absolutely no problems and answered every question with no trouble. I now score in the FOURTH PERCENTILE on those areas.
Despite its length, this has been a short summary of all the events over the past 6 years. Much has been summarized, and much has been left out. I tried my best to balance completeness with leaving out irrelevant details.
There is no record of any misconduct on the part of anyone involved in this that is available to any law enforcement agencies or to the public. Nobody has been disciplined. No investigation was ever conducted. I was almost killed and was seriously injured, under a camera, and in front of witnesses, and spent 6 years working with the government. The government has done precisely NOTHING.
The County now routinely retaliates against me whenever we interact, in blatant violation of various laws.
submitted by Adventurous-Plant419 to Bad_Cop_No_Donut [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:46 Adventurous-Plant419 Michael Alcock King, Joshua Myers, Andrew Cash, Mark Essick, with overt deliberate negligence on the part of the entire Board of Sonoma County Supervisors, stole 6 years of my life, after their employee Virgil Smith almost killed me and caused me serious injury.

I just want people to know that the Sonoma County government is corrupt. They spent 186 million dollars on a "new courthouse" that is 163k square feet, which works out to $1,100 per square foot, which is over double the second most expensive building I could find was, and over four times the average price per square foot of palaces and museums. And it's just going to look like a giant portable. This is to house some of the most corrupt people in this County, who all make $200-350+k per year (I am including their benefits in that, but not their pension). The entire DA's Office has a vendetta against Civil Rights in general, and will literally knowingly commit criminal violations of laws for the purpose of covering up serious criminal misconduct on the part of Sonoma County employees.
Lynda Hopkins took money from the law enforcement unions, and turns a willfully blind eye to it.
The County Office of Legal Counsel is literally a crime syndicate.
In 2015, the Sheriff's Office had a veritable torture ring in the jail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izcHIv5Y4z8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYrGChrW5HM&list=TLPQMzAwMzIwMjMv0QAOPDy1Lw&index=2
This is just the tip of the iceberg. They lied about the existence of these videos, and "lost" the one where they gave one of the inmates internal bleeding, with a knee to their back.
There was a lawsuit about it. It was called the "Yard Counseling Case". There are news articles about it.
There was an official, written policy, called "Yard Counseling", later its name was changed to "Behavior Counseling" which dictated that for arbitrary punitive measures, Sheriff's Office personnel should extract inmates from their cells individually (which meant slamming their heads onto the door frames on the way out and other abuse), and isolate them, and putting them into "pain compliance" techniques (literally, by definition, torture) for extended periods of time while "counseling" them, which meant wearing no name tags, ski masks and riot gear, carrying a shotgun with them, and insulting them in explicit language for over 20 minutes.
This official written policy was acknowledged by Rob Giordano in a video, where he lies that no inmates where injured, uploaded to YouTube in 2018, when they finally addressed this official written policy, and the practice of torturing inmates without reasonable cause (leading exercise routines, for example).
In 2021, they saw one of the victims of this torture ring, who had sued them and had won, at a peaceful protest, and shot him with a grenade launcher while hiding on a rooftop in the face with a crowd control grenade, which exploded on impact and caused horrific injury that I don't care to describe.
In 2017, I was almost killed by application of a "carotid hold" / lateral vascular neck restraint, by a sheriff's deputy, for literally no reason. A knee was placed on my lower back while I was on the ground on my stomach as well, which caused a serious injury to my kidney, which was the worst injury of my life. I have also been diagnosed with an organic brain injury and cognitive impairment. I was tested for the same type of cognitive impairment before the incident and there is a marked difference, and I have about 30 pages describing the differences I've noticed / troubles I've had in my cognitive functioning. There was no probable cause to arrest me, and I was polite and compliant with all the instructions given to me, and this was confirmed by witnesses. I was punished for invoking my right to remain silent, then my arm was grabbed and yanked up behind me, and then a carotid hold was applied because my body pivoted after the deputy grabbed and yanked my arm.
This occurred UNDER A CAMERA and IN FRONT OF WITNESSES. I called the Sheriff's Office the next day said I want to "make an official complaint in writing". I was transferred to Captain of Internal Affairs, Captain Mark Essick. I repeated my request, verbatim. He responded, verbatim: "We don't do that. Why don't you tell me what happened." I did. I told him it happened right under a camera. He said "The camera can't record." I asked for confirmation. He said the cameras "Don't have recording technology installed."
I asked the County for a claim form. They ignored my request, and instructed me to report the incident to IOLERO. IOLERO requested I meet with Internal Affairs, and I said fine.
Sgt. Andy Cash called me and scheduled me for a meeting at the Sheriff's den. I was made to walk first and guided upstairs to a meeting room, and then patted down for weapons, and the interview was recorded. For 75 minutes I was deposed about happened. He asked me repeatedly about my mental state after the incident. I admitted that I was upset after the incident, and he acted like that justified the whole incident. He explicitly promised to interview the 4 deputies who witnessed the event in addition to the 2 deputies who participated, as well as the arresting officer (who I told him would confirm that I was polite and cooperative), which he agreed "would confirm [my] demeanor", and a bystander witness I told him about.
I complained to IOLERO director Jerry Threet. Mr. Threet agreed that that was inappropriate, then resigned without reviewing the investigation.
For about 4 years review of the investigation was put on hold because IOLERO staff quit, and when more staff was hired, they complained of being understaffed. They had a budget of over a million dollars but only had 2 employees. They only reviewed one case per four months. And they put off "backlogged" cases and focused on new cases. My complaint was finally reviewed by Interim Director Garrick Byers who clearly stated that the investigation was not conducted appropriately. I have the letter from him. That still has never been made public.
After the interview with Internal Affairs, I corresponded with Lynda Hopkins, and she refused to give her opinion on the matter. I specifically complained that the carotid hold was being used recklessly, and it is a dangerous technique. This was in 2018. She forwarded me to Janell Crane, who then had me meet with Kristi Schultz.
I contacted the DA's Office and spoke to Richard Celli (who made $346k in 2017, and has gunned down two unarmed people, and was convicted by a jury in one of the civil cases brought against him by one of the victim's family, but the sentence was overturned by a judge, while working for the SRPD). The first time I spoke to Mr. Celli, he told me that another law enforcement agency should take my case. After that first time, him and the rest of the DA's Office openly refused to comply with the Victims' Rights Laws (CA Con Art. 1 S. 28), and the "policies" (which are legally binding under CA Con Art 5 S. 13) of the Attorney General stating clearly that they are to take complaints from victims if it can't be resolved with the department.
After the first talk with Mr. Celli, I called Rohnert Park Police as I was instructed, and they 3-way called the Sheriff's office and then transferred me. I spent about 30 minutes reporting the incident to a deputy, and he asked me questions in a fair manner. I called RPPD back and talked to the arresting officer and he positively clearly confirmed that I was "polite, calm, compliant, and cooperative" (or something nearly verbatim, I can't remember exactly any more).
Andrew Cash called me the next day, at precisely 7:00 AM. He told me he was driving. He was extremely confrontational with me. He said "There were 6 deputies [referring to the two who used excessive force on me, and 4 witness deputies]. You were combative." This was false. He had only interviewed one of the 4 witness deputies, and the other 3 had provided written statements. They said that they had witnessed force being used, that they had not participated in the use of force to the best of their memory, and that I "did not appear to be resisting". But again, he had promised explicitly to interview the 4 deputy witnesses, and the arresting officer
Internal Affairs exonerated the officers. The letter was signed by Eddie Engram, captain of Internal Affairs. I called Mr. Engram, and had an hour long conversation with him, and he told me to contact Sgt. Cash after April 1st.
I filed a federal claim on the last day that it was due.
Mr. Cash referred me to Legal Counselor, Kara Abelson.
Ms. Abelson spent a year and a half refusing to comply with the Public Records Act, the Rules of Procedure, and the Rules of Professional Conduct. She refused to provide me documents that I was entitled to under law, including the incident report written by Deputies Jacquelin Fazzio and Virgil Smith, and the recorded interviews that he promised he would conduct, and stated pretty clearly that he had conducted.
Kara Abelson spent a year and a half trying to claim that my federal complaint was time barred by 1 day when it wasn't. The judge (Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers) entertained this and forced me to respond SEVEN TIMES, before she finally admitted that the "law wouldn't allow [her] to dismiss my complaint".
After a year and a half, Kara Abelson finally withdrew from the case after I started citing the Rules of Professional Conduct to her that require her to resign or withdraw from the case rather than defend a civil case where defense isn't warranted. Nobody had disputed any of the allegations I had made. In fact, Eddie Engram had confirmed that what I said happened was not disputed by the evidence.
At some point around this time, either before or after Ms. Abelson withdrew, the 2 incident reports written by the two deputies, the written statements by 3 of the 4 witness deputies, and the recorded interviews with me, the 2 deputies who assaulted me, and 1 of the eye witness deputies, were provided, along with various other records from the facility. In the recorded interview, and the incident report, the deputies admitted that Virgil Smith had applied the carotid hold.
I had also reported the incident to the State Attorney General Public Inquiry Unite (Lupe Zinzin). She had told me, over and over and over, that the local DA's are required to take complaints from civilians in these situations. She refused to call the DA's Office, though. The DA's Office (Richard Celli, Mark Azzouni, David Kahl) refused to take a complaint from me. They (including the receptionists) hung up on me every time I called after no more than 2 minutes, for no reason, transferred me to dead lines, never returned any voicemails I managed to leave, told me explicitly that if I send a complaint, they will throw it away, and didn't care, at all, what the laws were. The receptionists also refuse to provide their names. The Attorney General's Office told me to send them a complaint, so I did. The DA's Office acknowledged receiving the complaint. But later said that they did not have a record of it, meaning they threw it away.
The Attorney General's Office finally agreed to take a complaint from me. It sat on their desk for a year. I finally called them, concerned that evidence was being destroyed, and left a voicemail for Casey Hallinan requesting that they request copies of the physical evidence from the Sheriff's Office. Literally 2 days after that voicemail, a letter was sent to me signed by Sharon Loughner with Casey Hallinan CC'ed on the letter, stating that they would "take no action", and blamed the incident on me. I had not received the letter though, and called and spoke to Ms. Hallinan, who was extremely rude. After that, the Attorney General's Office hang up on me as soon as they find out it's me, for no reason. There has since been a bystander witness who saw the whole thing, and it has come to light that the cameras did record, that no upgrades were ever performed like Ms. Abelson alleged, the cameras do continuously record (as of 2019), and they just lied through their teeth about the camera for 4 straight years. The Attorney General's Office does not care. They violate the laws, and do not care what the laws are.
Sonoma County Office of Legal Counsel attorney Michael King took over after Ms. Abelson withdrew. Right off the bat, Mr. King told me that my motions were deficient - a contention he has repeated frequently, since then. I asked him how. He changed the subject, and to this day has NEVER given any explanation as to how any of my motions are deficient.
He continued to claim that my claim was time barred, filing frivolous motions, in blatant violation of the rules of professional conduct, after I cited the rules to him, constituting explicit legal misconduct.
As I said, the judge finally agreed to open Discovery after a year and a half of full time work trying to fight for my right to not be nearly murdered for no reason.
Lawyers do not take these cases unless there is undeniable proof of blatant guilt, along with undeniable proof of catastrophic injury. Multiple law firms have confirmed that it takes over a million dollars worth of legal work to get these cases to trial.
The judge also promised me a pro bono attorney "if you make it past summary judgment".
The judge scheduled us for Alternative Dispute Resolution hearing with a magistrate judge. Mr. King elicited an offer from me, which I spent about 2 weeks working on, trying to make it as agreeable as possible. But then for the hearing, his written offer was to waive charging me his attorneys fees. The judge confirmed that there was no legal basis for him to do that - it would be illegal. He had been ordered to participate in this hearing, and there was a legal obligation under the Rules of Procedure to try in good faith to settle the case. He violated the order and the rule of procedure (26 (f)).
All of my motions were completely ignored for no reason.
Mr. King / Defendant Virgil Smith lied about the cameras. They said "Denies the existence of cameras capable of recording in the vicinity", in writing, under oath. They never disputed that he put his knee on top of my back with all his weight on it.
Mr. King refused to comply with his Discovery obligations. I had to file about 4 different motions pertaining to their refusal to comply with the laws regarding disclosure of evidence.
Upon receiving an official Discovery request for records of camera equipment, I received a letter signed under by Mr. King (nearly 4 years after the incident) stating that the cameras CAN RECORD. But stating "tasks must be performed" to start the recording function, and stating that all records pertaining to the equipment that was installed at the time HAD BEEN DESTROYED (literally a federal and state crime, a civil tort violation, and a sanctionable act of legal misconduct).
Mr. King refused to schedule any of the witnesses for deposition, demanded MY deposition BEFORE he would even schedule the two deputies who assaulted me, even though I had been requesting depositions with other witnesses for over a month, and refused to schedule anyone else, he refused to answer interrogatories, he refused to provide copies of the policies from the time of the incident. He tried to pass off a weird spreadsheet with the word camera on it as proof that upgrades had been done to the cameras. He refused to provide complete training records for the deputies. He refused to provide details about the training. He refused to provide blueprints of the facility, refused to provide photos of the cameras at the location, refused to provide still images showing which direction the cameras were pointing, refused to provide photos of the deputies so I could schedule depositions efficiently.
The judge erroneously dismissed my Equal Protection claims, construing them as Due Process and Employment Discrimination claims, which are different types of claims than Equal Protection claims against a government actor. The government cannot arbitrarily treat anyone disparately. The Court also dismissed my "Monell" claim against the municipality for their "policies, customs, or practices", but left me leave to amend that claim. And she waited until Discovery opened over 1.5 years into litigation, to do this, forcing me to amend the complaint DURING DISCOVERY which was only open for a limited amount of time, instead of any point in the 1.5 years prior to that.
In the recorded interview with Andrew Cash and one of the witness deputies, she spontaneously states that Mr. Cash instructed her to review the written statements made by the two deputies who assaulted me prior to the interview. Another deputy witness confirmed that Mr. Cash had instructed her to review the written reports by the two deputies who assaulted me prior to her providing Mr. Cash with a written statement as well.
The judge finally retaliated against me, without rational basis, for filing motions, which I had filed because I was being illegally obstructed from preserving evidence, by withdrawing leave to amend regarding the "Monell" claim (I had stated a clear Monell claim to begin with, but the judge literally has an aversion to reading, and relies on guessing, and is biased against pro se litigants; I am summarizing well over 100 pages, if not well over double that, of motions, objections, and replies and the judge's responsive orders).
She did however, finally schedule a hearing with a Discovery referee magistrate. All my motions (and the months of work I was required to do dictated by the various rules) was completely disregarded, and both me and Mr. King were given 2 pages each (double spaced) to go over discovery issues, even though I had filed about 4 different motions about various issues, and he hadn't filed ANY, at that time.
During conference I was required to do in accordance with the Rules, Mr. King repeatedly tried to establish that I had committed crimes during the course of conferring which was my legal obligation, without having any rational basis to believe what he was trying to establish. He demanded evidence that would exist, and he kept repeating every lie he could come up with to the judge. The judge would either get annoyed at me if I addressed any of Mr. King's baseless accusations, or take his statements at face value for being 100% true.
Mr. King finally "compromised" and agreed to schedule depositions with me (as long as Mr. King wanted to) and the two deputies who had assaulted me (for 25 minutes each or something) all simultaneously, but refused to schedule anyone else, even though this was grossly advantageous to him. One of the eye witness deputies later confirmed that he had "consulted" her over 4 times prior to the trial. During this deposition, Mr. King asked me where a family member of mine works. He had spent about 30-40 minutes trying to convince me that I can tell him anything, that the entire record was designated confidential, that I had nothing to worry about - and at a deposition, you are obligated to answer the questions unless they are harassing. Mr. King also requested contact information for counselors from over 10 years ago, and that was the only question I didn't answer - I told him to provide the request in writing. At some point after that, I told Mr. King to not contact my family member at her workplace, and Mr. King responded "unless you fully and completely cooperate" with his request for contact information for counselors from 10 years+ ago.
At the hearing, the Discovery Magistrate (Donna M. Ryu) discussed matters only with Mr. King, without including me. He told her that the 4 eye witness deputies "saw nothing" and "weren't there" (verbatim) trying to get her to deny me my request to take their deposition. She asked him if he would get them to sign fresh "sworn declarations", "under oath" (Judge Ryu's words, verbatim) stating this. Mr. King said yes, absolutely, he would. Judge Ryu asked me "Would that be okay?" I said "No." She started laughing, and asked me why, and I explained that I had explicitly described various interactions with them that had taken place while the carotid hold was still being applied to me, and that they had stated in their written statements that they had witnessed force being used, and that was "not resisting". She confirmed that this was all true with Mr. King and that he already knew all of this, and ordered him to cooperate with scheduling them for deposition.
After that, they went back to discussing matters only with eachother, and I was excluded from discussion. This was an hour long hearing, and at about the 45 minute mark, Mr. King was again lying to the magistrate judge, and when he had finished, I interjected, "That's not true". Judge Ryu shouted "Stop! Stop stop stop stop stop!" And then very assertively explained to me the importance of not interrupting people for the convenience of the court reporter / transcriber. I was excluded from the rest of the hearing.
At some point at either this hearing or the next one, I cited the legal requirement for the parties to disclose contact information for witnesses. I cited the rule of procedure. Judge Ryu responded, "Mr. King is a lawyer!" as if that alone justified his refusal to provide me contact information for witnesses.
Mr. King refused to provide both written statements from the eye witness deputies, and to schedule them for deposition, and stated that if he provided written statements, they would be copied and pasted versions of the same statements previously provided, signed under oath (nowhere saying that they "saw nothing" or "weren't there").
Mr. King kept threatening to go to my family member's workplace unless I provided him contact information for counselors from 10+ years ago, DURING a DEPOSITION, without him providing any written request for the information.
He also interfered with scheduling the witnesses for deposition, with the Court reporter that I had hired, disregarded the schedule that I had set, and set them each for 30 minutes, which raised the cost of deposition from an estimated about $700 to about $4,000, and said this was my one and only chance.
The Federal Pro Bono Project / the Justice & Diversity Center is an organization that receives seven million dollars a year in public funding and is under contract with the Federal District Court to work with the Court to provide legal consultation to pro se litigants. I had about 19 appointments with them, about 18 with Abby Herzberg, and 1 with Rosemarie Maliekel. Ms. Herzberg was precisely 15 minutes late to every single appointment, repeatedly gave me horrible advice ("just wait", do nothing, "don't file this", despite admitting that the entire motion was valid, directly causing excessive delay and the spoliation of crucial evidence). She also yelled at me aggressively on two occasions because I had brought up state laws, which were being currently violated against me, because the Court had dismissed my "state claims" because Sonoma County refused to supply with a state tort claim form when I first asked, reasoning that was not relevant to the state laws being currently violated against me. After Ms. Herzberg yelled at me the second time, I requested an appointment with Ms. Maliekel. Ms. Maliekel spent the entire appointment ranting at me about irrelevant issues, and kept talking over me and interrupting me. I was polite but eventually asked "can I finish what I was saying?" She responded "No!" and kept ranting at me.
I had repeatedly asked about how to properly get medical evidence, and about expert witnesses. Ms. Herzberg ignored my questions and spent nearly the entirety of almost every single appointment reading through the rules, without letting me speak at all, even to summarize the relevant sections of the rules that I had read.
On a video on their webpage (on the Court's website, because they are a "partner project" with the Court), Abby Herzberg explicitly demonstrates a clear understanding of the fact that the Court provides funding for expert witnesses, despite ignoring my questions about and spending nearly the entirety of almost every single appointment either reading rules or pretending to.
Discovery was closed.
Mr. King rehashed the legally baseless and frivolous "time barred" claim in a Motion for Summary Judgment. I was required to respond to it twice. I was required to answer all his "undisputed material facts" under threat of terminating my entire case, but he refused to answer mine. He lied over and over to the judges. As I said, the judge ruled that the laws "wouldn't allow her to" dismiss my entire case and rejected his Motion for Summary Judgement.
The Court ordered the Federal Pro Bono Project (FPBP) to put me on a list for attorneys seeking clients. Ms. Herzberg told me that if I filed any motions, that the FPBP would not cooperate with the Court's order, until 1 month before my trial, instead of 6 months before. She also said that a law firm had reached out to them about my case over a month prior to that, and that the staff at the FPBP had not followed up. My filing privileges were then revoked by the Court.
An attorney, David Ratner, reached out to me, and scheduled an initial consultation, over Zoom, at which he stated he "hates cops", and gave a showing of being enthusiastic. I explicitly told him that I wanted to make sure we were on the same page as far as what to "aim for". I told him that I had been working for FIVE YEARS, that I had almost died, that I had suffered two different extremely serious injuries. I told him that what I asked for was consistent with the most similar case (the Esa Wroth case of 2013) that I knew of (an ask of three million dollars). This was coincidental. I was not aware of the Esa Wroth case when I came up with that number. I agonized over that, and spent a lot of time trying to come up with a fair amount, and described the methods I used to come up with that number in detail in court documents. Mr. Ratner explicitly agreed to aim for that.
Mr. Ratner, and his partner, Shelley Mollineaux, who was set to represent me at trial under Mr. Ratner's supervision, then both went dark for over a month. They ignored my emails, voicemails, and messages that I left with their receptionists. There was a hearing, and then Mr. Ratner emailed me demanding "all the documents" that I had. I had over 50 gb of files across thousands of files, and spent about a month working with his paralegals sending them batches of files, and providing all the information they asked me for. Mr. Ratner forwarded me an email from Mr. King where King accused me of violating a court order regarding providing medical providers and the physical addresses of my entire family and my friends, which was false -- the Court had ordered me to provide him CONTACT information, at a second hearing, which wasn't significant, and I had fully and completely complied in good faith with all the Court's orders. Mr. Ratner accused me of not sending him "anything", after I had spent at least several weeks with his paralegals sending them batches of files and information, and he simultaneously threatened to ask the judge for leave to withdraw.
There had been major delays with medical evaluation due in large part to Covid, as well as delayed discovery of brain injury, which is very common, and other factors.
With trial set, Mr. Ratner forwarded me an offer from Defendants for $5,000. Upon discussion (which was 100% in email because he refused to talk over the phone and Ms. Mollineaux completely ignored me), he accused me of not doing Discovery right. I pointed him to the video I referred to earlier, which I had found since Mr. Ratner took my case, but wasn't aware of when I was interacting with the FPBP, where the FPBP (Abby Herzberg), and various District Judges from the Court I was litigating in, state that it is general policy (and it is official policy under the Court's General Order 25) to REOPEN DISCOVERY when a pro bono attorney comes onto the case, and to FUND DEPOSITION AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES.
Mr. Ratner stated he "won't file any motions" and ultimately elected to withdraw from the case over fulfill his legal obligations under the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court thanked him and granted him permission to withdraw. The FPBP refused to put me back on the list. I was forced into trial BY MYSELF, at 1-2 months prior to trial, after 2-3 months of my time being completely wasted by Mr. Ratner and his law firm.
I went through the appropriate legal process to submit an expert witness. The Court, as usual, completely ignored my motions, but allowed me to use him after I went through the entire legal process, and paid him thousands of dollars without knowing if I would be granted permission or not, and provided the Court a report stating that the carotid hold was ILLEGAL unless the subject exhibited "assaultive behavior" and that Defendants had never alleged any behavior of mine that constituted "assaultive behavior" (under POST Basic). The expert was a Master level instructor at a police academy and former SWAT.
Mr. King provided his pre-trial disclosures, and it contained a document from Rohnert Park police department which had been extensively redacted on the copy that they had provided to me. The new copy contained the contact information for the bystander witness. I called him, and he confirmed that he saw the entire thing, that I had never yelled at the deputies before the first deputy grabbed my arm, and that I was not resisting at any point in time. I told the judge this. She had me call him at a hearing, and both me and Mr. King were allowed a couple of minutes to ask him questions, where he refused to admit that I was even "wiggling" when Mr. King badgered him.
The judge then refused to allow him to appear over Zoom, and refused to summon him to the trial.
At the trial, the Judge accused me falsely of firing my attorney, and explicitly prohibited me from telling the jury that the Defendants had LIED about the camera's ability to record. She explicitly prohibited me from submitting scientific evidence about the carotid hold. She allowed Mr. King to make extremely defamatory false remarks about me and my past which had a huge impact on the jury's perception of things. At a pretrial hearing, we had gone over about 110 documents that I wanted to present at the trial. She vetted about 40 as admissible at the hearing, but at the trial she only let me submit about 5. Defendants were allowed to submit a SECOND expert witness, both of whom worked for the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office. The first was Andrew Cash. The second was James Naugle who had been disclosed literally a week before trial, without a report, and without allowing me to take his deposition. She refused to allow me to ask Mr. Naugle about case laws, or about information pertaining to the carotid hold. The Court refused to summon any of my treating physicians, whom I had provided the names and contact information for in my disclosures at the end of Discovery and some in my initial disclosures, and I had complied with Mr. King's written requests for information or objected within the boundaries of the law, in good faith, and complied with the Court's orders, in good faith.
I had informed the Court that I was scheduled for medical evaluations for brain injury AFTER THE TRIAL. The Court completely ignored this.
So it was my word against theirs. 5 years, at the time of the mistrial, to get a mockery of a trial, and have the jurors' time completely wasted. The jury wrote me a letter thanking me or something, but awarded me nothing.
I was diagnosed with organic brain injury after the trial. I had a similar test prior to the incident and had absolutely no problems and answered every question with no trouble. I now score in the FOURTH PERCENTILE on those areas.
Despite its length, this has been a short summary of all the events over the past 6 years. Much has been summarized, and much has been left out. I tried my best to balance completeness with leaving out irrelevant details.
There is no record of any misconduct on the part of anyone involved in this that is available to any law enforcement agencies or to the public. Nobody has been disciplined. No investigation was ever conducted. I was almost killed and was seriously injured, under a camera, and in front of witnesses, and spent 6 years working with the government. The government has done precisely NOTHING.
The County now routinely retaliates against me whenever we interact, in blatant violation of various laws.
submitted by Adventurous-Plant419 to TooManyBadApples [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:46 Ace_Scientist (Spoilers) Analysis & Questions on the Roekaar

I'm on my fourth/fifth playthrough (not sure which one), and I have done some analysis of the Roekaar during my playthroughs. And honestly, the Roekaar - and more specifically Akksul - are kind of tragic.
Out of every group in the game, from the Initiative to the Outcasts to the Collective to the Resistance and beyond, the Roekaar are the most like the kett. Akksul's hatred and arrogance has made him so akin to the thing he hates the most. Theses are the similarities I've noticed between the Roekaar and the kett.
1)Kett: Think of themselves as superior to all other races and abhohate every race that isn't them. They refer to said races as 'it', and constantly dehumanize/depersonalize said races.
Roekaar: Hate and abhor every race that aren't angara, refer to said races as 'it', and constantly dehumanize/depersonalize said races.
2) Kett: Used manipulation and sabotage widely in an attempt to subjugate the angaran people upon first contact with them. They used this to turn the angara against each other, even their own allies. Multiple angara speak of this, and the reason the angara are so slow to trust Ryder and the Initiative at first is because of how the kett manipulated and turned them against each other.
Roekaar: Use manipulation and sabotage against the Milky Way settlers, as well as against their own people. They harmed innocent angaran scientists and attempted to destroy the sacred place they were studying - The Forge - to attempt to turn the other angara against their allies against the kett, the Initiative. Manipulation and sabotage was also used against the Resistance on Voeld, when Akksul somehow obtained information about the Resistance and proceeded to steal weeks of supplies from the Resistance base on Voeld. This was done despite knowing how dire the situation was for the Resistance on Voeld, as well as knowing how important Voeld was in the fight against the kett.
3) Kett: Led by a self-righteous figurehead who is an icon to all kett. (The Archon)
Roekaar: Led by a self-righteous figurehead who is an icon to all Roekaar. (Akksul)
4) Kett: Have propaganda and materials that turn non-kett to the kett cause/purpose. Both the propaganda and the results can be seen on the exaltation facility on Voeld, where angara are brainwashed/indoctrinated (non-Reaper indoctrination, of course) into believing in the kett superiority to the point where they willingly become kett.
Roekaar: Have propaganda and materials that turn angara to the Roekaar cause. Evident in the Roekaar manifestos found on Havarl, and likely distributed across angaran space.
5) Kett: Operate on a sole directive/'Truth' that all kett know and accept. All kett believe that kett are superior to all races and that all races must be eliminated or converted - literally - into kett.
Roekaar: Operate on a sole directive/'Truth' that all Roekaar know and accept. All Roekaar believe that all non-angara are inherently a threat to the angaran species and must be eliminated. Additionally, they seem to want to convert all angara to their 'Truth'. This goes to the point where some Roekaar even despise, attack, or murder other angara who ally with non-angara, as seen in a mission given by Reyes on Kadara.
6) Kett: Regularly tear angaran families apart through abduction, murder, working them to death in forced labor camps, or brainwashing and converting them into kett in exaltation facilities.
Roekaar: Regularly tear angaran families apart by convincing them to become Roekaar, leading to converts abandoning their families and possibly the Resistance and refusing/ignoring pleas for them to return.
The Roekaar are honestly kind of confusing. Apparently before the Nexus arrived, the Roekaar fought the kett, just in a different way than the Resistance. Before all, Akksul - and most to all angara - hate the kett the most. One can assume this extends to the rest of the Roekaar. And yet, when the Milky Way settlers arrive, pretty much all Roekaar activity is against them and not the kett. You can even find several situations where the Roekaar actively hindeattack their own people. Akksul himself goes against basic angaran military doctrine. From the codex, angaran military doctrine prioritizes preserving angaran life and culture over vengeance on the kett. I don't think stealing supplies from the Resistance, murdering fellow angara, or harming scientists and attempting to blow up one of the most sacred angaran locations follows this doctrine. Keep in mind that blowing up the Forge wasn't even motivated by the kett, but by the Initiative. The kett don't need to manipulate and sabotage the angara to splinter them more, Akksul's already doing that for them. Had he succeeded in that task on Havarl, he would have turned the angara and possibly the Resistance against the Initiative, their allies, whom they staunchly need in the fight against the kett. I have no doubt that if he had succeeded the angara had somehow decided to wage war on the Initiative in return for them blowing up the Forge, that would have just made it all the more easier for the kett to defeat the angara. Make no mistake - when the Initiative arrives, the angara are losing the fight against the kett. They haven't lost, but they are losing.
It's just so ironic and tragic that Akksul, who hates the kett more than anything, becomes the most like them. Something that's also tragic - and so ridiculous it's almost funny - is that Akksul and his Roekaar fight against the kett after the Milky Way settlers arrive by...not fighting the kett. Everywhere you look, Roekaar forces appear to be focused on the Milky Way immigrants instead of the kett. They even jeopardize and hinder the Resistance's ability to fight the kett on multiple occasions. The Roekaar, who were formed on Akksul's hatred of the kett, don't fight the kett. It's just so ridiculous. Maybe some parts of them do, like the Roekaar who were protecting Akksul's friend on Havarl from the kett, but pretty much all of their operations seem to be centered on the Milky Way settlers. No wonder Akksul's Roekaar abandon him if you don't kill him after Jaal points out that at that point in time, the Initiative and Pathfinder have done more for the angara in the short time they've been there than Akksul and Roekaar have since - well, probably since the Nexus arrived 14 months ago. Akksul was so consumed by hatred that he lost his humanity, for lack of a better term. That he forgot that he should've been fighting for the angara, to make sure no one went through what he did at the kett's hands. It truly is tragic, and though I doubt it, maybe Akksul realizes this if you let him live at the end of Jaal's loyalty mission.
Edit: grammar fixes and also there was a '.' instead of a ')' after the 1 and it messed up the spacing and it was bugging me
submitted by Ace_Scientist to MassEffectAndromeda [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:41 kittenfloof [BREEDS] Low-energy breeds for a runner/apartment dweller?

I'm a 26-year old female who has been strongly considering dog ownership! I've been postponing adopting a dog until I was secure in my finances, relationship, and living situation. This year, I finally reached a point of financial stability in my life, and I've built up an emergency fund of a few thousand dollars. I also settled into a one-bedroom apartment with my boyfriend of two years.
  1. Will this be your first dog? If not, what experience do you have owning/training dogs.
* This will be my first dog as an adult! As a child, I grew with a golden retriever and two Brittany Spaniels, but I was never the primary caregiver.
  1. Do you have a preference for rescuing a dog vs. going through a [reputable breeder]( http://ownresponsibly.blogspot.com/2011/07/identifying-reputable-breeder.html)?
* Right now, I'm looking into rescuing, either through a humane society or rescue organization.
  1. Describe your ideal dog.
* When I think of my ideal, dog, I imagine an affectionate life companion -- a dog who actively seeks out human affection, rather than tolerates it! :) I also live in an apartment, so a low-energy (and relatively quiet dog) is ideal. To make up for my small living conditions, I hope to take my dog on a few walks a day, visit the dog park, or even have a running partner! I'm primarily a home-body, so a dog that likes to curl up on the couch with me would be great! I am looking for a dog that requires light grooming -- I don't want to be visiting a groomer weekly -- and sheds minimally. In addition, I have a one-year old cat so I am looking into dogs with low prey drives.
  1. What breeds or types of dogs are you interested in and why?
* I have strongly been considering greyhounds! When researching breeds, I was surprised to learn that they can make great apartment dogs; they are low-energy, low-shed, and do not bark as much as other breeds! As a runner myself, I love the idea of adopting a retired racer and giving a greyhound a permanent home! I've heard that greyhounds aren't built for endurance runs, so being a running buddy isn't a deal breaker!
I have also looked into other breeds that are recommended for apartments, such as the pug or Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
  1. What sorts of things would you like to train your dog to do?
* I anticipate training basic commands.
  1. Do you want to compete with your dog in a sport (e.g. agility, obedience, rally) or use your dog for a form of work (e.g. hunting, herding, livestock guarding)? If so, how much experience do you have with this work/sport?
* I am not interested in sporting events at this time.
**Care Commitments*\*
  1. How long do you want to devote to training, playing with, or otherwise interacting with your dog each day?
* I anticipate interacting with my dog for upwards of 3 hours a day.
8) How long can you exercise your dog each day, on average? What sorts of exercise are you planning to give your dog regularly and does that include using a dog park?
* I am planning to walk my dog for at least an hour a day: at least 30 minutes each before and after work. I also live only a 5-minute walk from my work, and I can exercise my dog during my hour lunch. I would love to visit the dog park and potentially take my dog on runs.
  1. How much regular brushing are you willing to do? Are you open to trimming hair, cleaning ears, or doing other grooming at home? If not, would you be willing to pay a professional to do it regularly?
* I am willing to do low-maintenance grooming myself, such as regular brushing, trimming nails, and cleaning ears.
**Personal Preferences*\*
  1. What size dog are you looking for?
I am open to any size dog, but most drawn to medium to large breeds.
  1. How much shedding, barking, and slobber can you handle?
* I am pretty uptight when it comes to cleanliness, so I am looking into a low-shed dog. I also live in an apartment, so a decently-quiet barker is ideal!
  1. How important is being able to let your dog off-leash in an unfenced area?
* I do not anticipate letting my dog off-leash so I can prioritize his/her safety!
**Dog Personality and Behavior*\*
  1. Do you want a snuggly dog or one that prefers some personal space?
* Definitely snuggly!
14) Would you prefer a dog that wants to do its own thing or one that’s more eager-to-please?
* I would prefer a dog who is eager to please and seeks out human affection.
  1. How would you prefer your dog to respond to someone knocking on the door or entering your yard? How would you prefer your dog to greet strangers or visitors?
* I would prefer my dog to be quiet and unbothered when strangers approach my door; I also would prefer a dog that is tolerant and welcoming to visitors.
  1. Are you willing to manage a dog that is aggressive to other dogs?
* I am hoping for a social dog that is tolerant towards other dogs.
  1. Are there any other behaviors you can’t deal with or want to avoid?
* I am wary of separation anxiety and destructive behaviors, so I would like to avoid this if possible.
**Lifestyle*\*
18) How often and how long will the dog be left alone?
* My dog would be left alone on the weekdays between the hours of 9AM-12AM, and 1PM-4:30 PM. My partner and I are fortunate to live right next door to our workplaces, so we can check in on the dog during our hour-long lunch break! My partner and I are homebodies who rarely travel, so our lifestyle is accommodating for dog caretaking.
19) What are the dog-related preferences of other people in the house and what will be their involvement in caring for the dog?
* My partner prefers an affectionate dog as well! We will be splitting the responsibilities of ownership equally, but I expect to be the primary owner in charge of walks.
20) Do you have other pets or are you planning on having other pets? What breed or type of animal are they?
* We have a one-year old cat.
21) Will the dog be interacting with children regularly?
* No, we are not planning on children in the near future.
22) Do you rent or plan to rent in the future? If applicable, what breed or weight restrictions are on your current lease?
* We currently live in an apartment that allows dogs with some restrictions; breeds that are restricted are pitbull breeds (American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier); Rottweiler; Doberman Pinscher; Akitas; and Chows.
23) What city or country do you live in and are you aware of any laws banning certain breeds?
* We live in Pasadena, California outside of Los Angeles and are not aware of banned breeds.
24) What is the average temperature of a typical summer and winter day where you live?
* Summers can be hot -- in the 80s and above. Winters are cool and wet, and temperatures can be in the 40's.
submitted by kittenfloof to dogs [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:38 sinclairsays New resume based on critiques (old resume 2nd slide) AE Senior

I still need to make a few bullet points stronger. But is there any more advice? Thanks to those who commented on my old resume
submitted by sinclairsays to EngineeringResumes [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:38 PaltaGangg are apartment offices open on saturdays?

is it worth spending the time to go apartment hunting Saturday mornings or are most places closed on weekends in Toronto? let me know if should save myself a trip physically going places
submitted by PaltaGangg to askTO [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:37 jcpm18 Subleasing my room at stadium house for $900 a month June-July 2023, DM if interested.

Subleasing my room at stadium house for $900 a month June-July 2023, DM if interested.
I pay $1100 a month but am only subleasing my room in a 4x4 for $900 a month from June 1st-July 31st 2023.
Stadium house is a very new apartment complex built on a five below and right next to WAWA. Located in the heart of midtown, right next to the bars, St. Augustine church, a chain of restaurants, study edge. Across the street from campus (chem lab building, lib west, plaza of americas) and super close to the stadium. Only minutes away from chipotle, CFA, publix, etc.
Other details:
Located on the 3rd floor
Fully furnished; private room with a bed, desk with an office chair, walk-in closet, private bathroom with smart-mirror with LED lights and bluetooth.
Common area includes a couch, TV, internet access, full kitchen with granite countertops, in-unit washer and dryer, balcony.
Amenities:
rooftop pool, golf simulator, karaoke room, gym access, study rooms on all floors, and study lounge.
Image is attached. The floor plan shown is mirrored to the actual floor plan. Please PM if interested!
https://preview.redd.it/xsdh2lpxq6ra1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=e093ede096cb49b4584f727fe2871ff1cdc53acc
submitted by jcpm18 to ufl [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:37 lengthycluthsy I’m in love with my bestfriend and don’t know what to do

I (17M) am in love with my bestfriend (18F). I’ve been in love with her for 9 months, and I don’t know what to do. For starters she doesn’t like me back, she’s said she veiws me as her bestfriend and nothing more. She doesn’t show any affection unless its in platonic terms, though that only started in Feburary. Before that she would call me pet names, flirt to a certain degree, and much more. February and to now she’s been distant and seemingly giving me the cold shoulder at times. Before she’s never talked about wanting a partner and now she does every other day, it genuinely hurts. Due to my crush’s change, becoming sensitive, distant, and more, I’ve decided not to be as affectionate since I wouldn’t want to make her uncomfortable, I’m giving her space too. She’s only known about my crush for 6 months, which isn’t that long putting it into perspective, I don’t want to rush her and I want her to have as much time as she needs. She has been asked out for jokes before I knew her and had a lot of fake friends, so sometimes I wonder if she actually believes me when I tell her I love her and want to be with her.
My friends tell me I should move on from her, that it won’t be worth waiting for someone who doesn’t, and might never reciprocate my feelings. Ontop of this there is someone who has a crush on me, (16F) who I’ve told I don’t want to get into a relationship until I’ve “gotten rid of my feelings for my crush” and “I don’t want to be in a relationship right now” though I’ve told her this for two months and so far my feelings for my crush only grew. Apart of me wants to get rid of my feelings for her because I don’t want to ruin our friendship, which is very dear to me, but the other part wants to hold onto the feelings I have for her and wait as long as I have to for her.
submitted by lengthycluthsy to relationships_advice [link] [comments]


2023.04.01 04:30 grosselisse Why are people weird 🤣

I was sitting on a bench at the mall waiting for someone and two kids ran up to me giggling and screaming. One jumped up behind me, put her hands on my back and tried to hide behind me like I was a piece of furniture, and the other tried to CLIMB me to get to the other one.
But the two adults they were with, who I think were their grandparents, did nothing, except when I said, "Please don't touch me" the guy pulled them towards him but said nothing to admonish them. No "don't do that", no "we don't climb strangers in the mall", no stranger danger talk, nothing???? 🤣
Who doesn't teach their kids it's not appropriate to climb a stranger??? Apart from disrespecting my personal space, I could have been someone dangerous. I know it takes a village but come on. Parents are sometimes so effing weird.
submitted by grosselisse to childfree [link] [comments]